Tag Archive for 'friday-the-13th'

16
Aug

in the company of slashers

A couple of weekends ago, I was sitting on a panel at a film convention with a bunch of other writers, discussing “Monster Rallies” (movies with more than one major monster in them).

We had to talk about the Universal Monster Rallies of the 1940s (you know, the ones with Frankenstein’s monster, Dracula, and the Wolfman). We had to talk about the Toho series of Japanese monsters, and all those battles between Godzilla and his enemies from space. But the really cool part was making the discovery that we all were looking forward–with anticipation–to the first big Monster Rally in American cinema in over 50 years. We all wanted to see Freddy vs. Jason.

Me, I was hoping that it would be like a Toho movie… with Freddy and Jason just knocking each other down, brutalizing each other, going at each other like mad until you think one or the other is finished, only to see them both get up and come back for another round.

So when I heard that Freddy brings Jason back from the dead and sets him to work killing teens on Elm Street (so that Freddy will be remembered again and be able to come back to terrorize the children there), I couldn’t help but think that it sounded almost too good to be true. I mean, with a few changes (made necessary by the differences between these monsters), that’s basically the underlying plot from x-number of Godzilla movies from the late 60s and early 70s. In these movies, space aliens invariably find some way to control Godzilla and make him attack Tokyo so that they can bring in the space monsters and assume control of the earth. Inevitably, Godzilla escapes their control, and gets into a big brutal knock-down, tear-each-other-up battle with the space monsters.

I am happy to report that my wishes all came true. Freddy vs. Jason really is like a Toho Monster Rally, dressed up in a lot of Freddy and Jason garb. Wait, that’s not quite right. This is definitely a slasher movie with two slashers. Freddy and Jason aren’t just window dressing for an underlying Toho plot. Maybe the best way to put it is that the writers have found clever ways to weave the Freddy universe together with the Jason universe and come out with a reasonably seamless piece of cloth. What they’ve learned from the Japanese movies is how to culminate the picture in an entertaining monster battle.

Needless to say, I enjoyed the film. My only real criticism is that the actors seem to sleepwalk through the parts where they have to provide some necessary exposition (like “Who’s Freddy?” or “Who’s Jason?”… and “What are the rules for fighting Freddy?” or “What are the rules for fighting Jason?”). This is standard material for monster movies (like Van Helsing needing to tell his listeners what vampires are and how to fight them), but here there’s no energy behind the exposition. The actors play it more like “Ho-hum, gotta do some explaining now.”

But aside from that, the movie consists of a lot of action and a number of entertaining set-pieces. I mean, just imagine Jason arriving at a Rave all in flames, or Freddy entering Jason’s dreams to take him back to his original drowning (while a group of Elm Street kids drive a heavily tranquilized Jason back to Crystal Lake).

Oh, and as for the big monster battle… yeah, they do deliver. They fight on Freddy’s turf (in Jason’s dreams). They fight on Jason’s turf at Crystal Lake. They slash and bash and mangle each other, and they both go into the water at the end.

But I’ll leave it to you to find out who comes out the winner… if there is a winner indeed.

See the Blogcritics posting of this article.

03
Jun

21st century ripper movies: ripper—letter from hell

I came across this one day at the video store. At the time, my husband didn’t want to rent it, but I kept my eye on it. Last night we finally saw it.

I really thought it was going to be terrible. It was clearly a Direct-To-Video production which had never seen theatrical release in the United States. And when I checked the Internet Movie Database to see whether or not it was even listed, I found a user review that went like this:

This movie helps the viewer gain a real insight into the minds of serial killers. It really does, because by the time this piece of utter garbage is over you want to do away with pretty much anybody who had anything to do with it. I mean anybody. The actors, director, writer, producer - even the best boy and key grip! They all need to be prevented from making any more movies.

Not a very promising start, I’d say.

But I sucked up my courage and stuck it in the DVD player. Turned out that it was actually a pretty decent little slice-and-dice teen slasher movie, but with a more sophisticated and clever plot. Now, admittedly, in order to appreciate it, you probably have to like teen slasher movies… and I know that a lot of you probably don’t. People who don’t have been giving this thing terrible reviews; people who do have been giving it excellent reviews. There doesn’t seem to be much middle ground. You either think it’s the worst movie you’ve ever seen, or you think it’s totally brilliant.

BASIC PLOT: Ripper copycat movie, with an obvious, but fairly clever, nod to the SCREAM series (particularly SCREAM 2). Molly–the only survivor of a previous serial killer slaughter–takes a college class on the theory behind serial murder. Jack the Ripper, of course, is a primary focus of the course, especially since the professor is a well-known profiler who has written a book proving with DNA that the killer was (authentic Ripper suspect) Montague John Druitt. As the course progresses, students in the class start dying around the previous survivor, killed in ways that resemble the Ripper’s modus operandi. To complicate matters, the detective on the case is convinced that the killer they are facing is the same serial killer who nearly killed Molly five years earlier.

THE BAD:
1) After a really excellent, and intense, opening sequence, the film settles in on its first scene in a college classroom. In this scene, the behavior of the female students is way over-the-top, complete with brazen come-ons to the professor. In this scene–which introduces us to the characters–we come to believe that there is nothing resembling real people in this film. Thankfully, the rest of the film overcomes this problem. But some of the teens can still be pretty annoying.

2) The ending is mind-bending, which some people hate. (But I really love).

THE GOOD:
1) The makers of this film really did their homework on Jack the Ripper. The discussions of the case are extremely accurate. They’ve got the names of all the victims right. They have the killer’s M.O down to a tee. And they even manage to work all this Ripper stuff in to a plot that relies on the Ripper murders (and on elements of SCREAM 2), but without ever seeming too totally derivative or predictable. It’s commendably done.

2) The plot has more of the intrigue, amateur detective stuff and psychological issues involved in the giallo film, rather than just the rudimentary trappings of plot that most slasher movies possess. The film also has a lot of slasher and giallo in-jokes, which are fun for people who enjoy these sub-genres of horror. Ala nearly any Dario Argento movie, virtually the only thing we ever see of the killer is his black gloves. And, in a nod to Friday the 13th, kids are getting killed in the forest in the rain.

3) There are red herrings galore. The filmmakers establish about 5 or 6 people as potential suspects… at least in the viewers’ mind. And they play the potential suspects against each other, in typical Ripper (and yes, giallo) movie fashion.

4) The movie has a calculatedly grunge look that’s perfect for capturing the Pacific Northwest youth culture of this film. It also has terrific, adrenalin-pumping murder sequences, packed with suspense.

5) The ending is mind-bending, which some people (like me) really love.

This is actually one of the better Ripper copycat movies I’ve seen, and I think it’s actually the first Ripper-copycat sophisticated teen slasher movie that I’ve ever seen.

I rate it 7/10 (or 3.5 out of 5 stars).

31
May

faux ripper 101: new york ripper

New York Ripper is not a Jack the Ripper film. It’s not even about a Ripper copycat (though Jack the Ripper—JtR for short) IS mentioned at one point during the investigation. This film is what I call a “Faux Ripper” movie (i.e. a film which uses “Ripper” in one of its titles—generally for marketing reasons—but which is not about JtR). This film uses “Ripper” in its original Italian title, and in all English versions.

At any rate, this film is an Italian giallo film, by ultraviolent filmmaker Lucio Fulci. The killer in this movie is extremely sadistic (in the film’s most famous scene, he slits a woman’s eyeball with a razor), and he taunts the NYPD by phoning them up and speaking in a duck-quack voice.

Though this film fits into the giallo subgenre of Italian horror, it is not really representative of gialli as a whole. The giallo subgenre generally combines murder mystery, high body count, variety of killing styles, dazzling cinematography, and the ultimate unraveling of the mystery… kind of like Halloween (part ONE!) and Friday the 13th (part ONE!)–though neither of those movies has the high cinematic style of the typical giallo.

FYI: gialli are pretty violent films. BUT in New York Ripper Lucio Fulci goes beyond the violence of the standard giallo film… particularly the gialli by filmmakers like Mario Bava and Dario Argento. That’s partly why I’m saying it’s not really a representative giallo. But in addition, it has a much more gritty look than any Bava or Argento giallo would. If you watch Bava’s Blood and Black Lace or Argento’s Deep Red—and then watch New York Ripper—you’ll quickly understand what I mean.

The ultraviolence in Fulci’s film is not really surprising, given that one of the script writers also contributed to the script of Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust… a movie so extreme that many people thought it was a snuff film. Actually, you could say it was so extreme that it got banned in ITALY!!! (I believe that it’s still banned to this day in the U.S.).

Despite its ultraviolence (and the fact that it’s not about Jack the Ripper), New York Ripper is well-made, presents an interesting mystery, and really explores the seedy side of New York. But this film is not recommended for anybody who does not have a very strong stomach or who does not want to watch extreme screen violence. I’m saying that as a critic who has seen the film for professional reasons, but who does not generally watch movies THIS violent for pleasure.

So consider yourselves warned! :-)

Resources:

Giallo (Wikipedia)—Encyclopedia overview of giallo.
Mario Bava, “Bava Speaks”—What the “creator” of giallo says about his work.
Dario Argento, Dark Dreams—A UK website devoted to the work of Dario Argento
Lucio Fulci, Official Lucio Fulci Website—includes a useful bio




Welcome to Hollywood Ripper

...the most comprehensive guide to Jack the Ripper movies on the Web!

 

subscribe to ripperlady blog

click the rss icon here to subscribe

 

Add to Technorati Favorites

 

Follow me on Twitter